Leaving the concrete jungle of Chandigarh, I headed for the old British hill station of Shimla aboard the narrow-gauge railway—affectionately called the to the Shimla Toy Train—which winds its way over the course of eight hours through more than a hundred tunnels and even more switchbacks.

The town was once a summer home to the Britsh Raj, who came to get out of the overwhelming heat of Delhi. Shimla is a hugely popular vacation and honeymoon center for affluent Indians, and as a result the town has a really relaxed atmosphere and I enjoyed spending a few days people-watching, strolling along the British-colonial architecture, browsing the busy market street, and enjoying the delicious north Indian cuisine. Here's a video of Shimla's market street, followed by a few scenes from the city:
6 Comments:
I don't know you too, too well, but you are missed. I have really enjoyed reading about your trip. I'm still amazed at your bravery - I don't know if I could travel for so long, by myself.
This is an interesting post, in regard to your information surrounding the Chinese government. I wonder if it will ever change, I fear the answer is no. But, there is always hope.
It's a thrill to read and learn about your travels, Ryan. What an amazing experience! I'm excited for you and I love living vicariously through these blogs, it's like I'm right there along-side. You're a very courageous person. Good luck and be safe! - Corwin
As far as changing Tibet through embarrassment of humiliation, it might be somewhat effective, especially from NGO’s and people who are unaffiliated with the government. But, all in all, I doubt that it would have much impact. I don’t think Westerners can have too much influence on events in Tibet.
Why?
Here are a few reasons I can think of:
1) To be fair to China, Tibet was an important place on the chessboard in Russia and Great Britian’s 19th century rivalry known as the “Great Game”. The two empires struggled for territory over the Crimea, Xinjiang, India, Tibet, Korea, and all sorts of other places. From China’s point of view, these two nations seriously eroded its sovereignty in China itself. Allowing a foreign empire to have a colony on your borders is dangerous. Under these circumstances, China would naturally see maintaining Tibet as a vital key to securing “China proper”.
2) As mentioned above, China and Russia have traditionally sought protection of their homelands by pacifying and securing border areas. So, for China, Tibet is a key piece of its geopolitical security. The US has military bases in Korea, Japan, Afghanistan, “Pakistan (where we already have four bases), India, Australia, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, and even, unbelievably, Vietnam” In total, the US has about 130 military bases worldwide. China views themselves as being encircled. A truly “free” Tibet would immediately align itself with the US and other powers to counter China. The Chinese aren’t dumb enough to let that happen.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0115-08.htm.
3) China also perpetuates a history of “victomhood” by the Western imperialist powers, which indeed is based on fact. Chinese people massively despise being labeled as “evil” or other such things. Any attempt to embarrass China without Chinese people feeling that your genuinely are rooting for their development is bound to be treated with contempt.
4) Most actions regarding foreign or Tibet complaints about the brutal treatment of Tibetans on the part of the Chinese will never reach a mainstream Chinese audience due to censorship. So, a normal Chinese person would react to a foreigner (no matter how well-intentioned) complaining about human rights abuses in Tibet with tremendous confusion and suspicion of intent
5) China believes Taiwan is part of China. The historical record, in my opinion, actually proves that the Chinese case has a lot of merit, and it certainly does legally (from what I have read). The only reason Taiwan is not part of China today is because of US interference, for better or for worse. Personally, I think most of the American interference was justified. But, in any case, most Chinese who care about politics feel that America has “split” their homeland in order to suppress China’s rightful state in the world. So, any whiff of a “free Tibet” is naturally seen as an American plot, no matter what the details or real facts are.
So, I have no idea how to advance Tibet’s cause. Armed struggle would end in failure and would be disastrous for many Tibetans in the Chinese government, Tibetans who would be unfairly killed, and the many innocent Chinese who would be killed. On the other hand, a Martin Luther King-style “passive resistance” would fail. For that strategy to work, you need 1) a middle class oppressor who might be sympathetic to your cause (think middle-class Britain towards Gandhi or America towards the injustices blacks faced); and 2) a free media to show to that middle class the injustices that are happening in their name. Tibet has neither of those conditions.
I am starting to read about this more. It’s really hard to get an objective view of what is going on in Tibet. In China, the central governments policies are known as 政策 zhèngcè, while the local governments carry out counter-policies对策 duìcè. My guess is that the Tibetans have learned to nod, and smile, and accept the Party’s official line, and then completely ignore it once the supervision is gone. At least that’s the way the rest of the country works
Thanks Bill! That's really good insight and info, as always.
I dont think Americans can take moral high ground or for that matter any ground at all regarding Tibet, When you have accupied Iraq unlawfully. At least Tibet was part of China untill Tibetan Kings declared themselves independent. Care to care about Iraqis
I have spoken out against the Iraq war, and I thought it was a mistake from the beginning. The same is true for one half of America.
Thanks for stopping by,
Ryan
Post a Comment
<< Home